Americans just cannot get enough of football on television.
Based on a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Even though ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, countless viewers keep watching, even if oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a game that drew just 20,256 fans a week ago but attracted the average television audience of 1,114,000, based on ESPN.”
Schrotenboer continues on to state, “Only 1 bowl game a year ago drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers normally, based on Nielsen. That’s better compared to the 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game a year ago involving the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Could you imagine then your following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds a unique television studio strictly for the goal of hosting college bowl games. The tv network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In that way, it does not have any middleman to deal with for these additional events, eliminating needing to negotiate with another facility to host the game. No costs for having to operate a vehicle production trailers or fly technical crews halfway across the country.
Because this facility could be built as a tv studio and not as an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN will make attending the bowl game a true multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee along with the television viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio might have merely a limited amount of seats, say 5,000 or less, which may minimize construction costs. The studio would not need to be much larger than the average college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough to show to the million plus viewers that there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be described as a single bad seat in the house. You’d rest assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate through the entire facility.
Because of the limited way to obtain seats, this will force ticket demand (and prices) up. No further 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities which are less than the usual quarter full. It would have been a 180-degree change from the present experience, by which many schools have to depend on daily deal sites to simply help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit simply because they wouldn’t have to buy the 1000s of tickets that they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could utilize this facility multiple times throughout the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
For example, this season five additional college football teams qualified for a pan that they certainly were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network aren’t generating countless dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers prefer to be buying time on a tv program that most viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also want it – going to a pan game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”